D. @Haqiqatjou attacks Ibn AbdelWahhab for saying Shirk in His time was worse than pre-Islamic Arabia in some aspects.
Dan also claims Al-Alusi [a contemporary of Ibn AbdelWahhab] is his imam who represents his view on istighatha. Let's read his identical testimony:
1/15🧵
Dan also claims Al-Alusi [a contemporary of Ibn AbdelWahhab] is his imam who represents his view on istighatha. Let's read his identical testimony:
1/15🧵
In his commentary on the verse in Surah Yunus:
"It is He who enables you to travel on land and sea until, when you are in ships and they sail with them by a favorable wind, and they rejoice in it, there comes a stormy wind and waves come upon them from everywhere,
"It is He who enables you to travel on land and sea until, when you are in ships and they sail with them by a favorable wind, and they rejoice in it, there comes a stormy wind and waves come upon them from everywhere,
and they think they are surrounded, they call upon Allah, sincere to Him in religion, 'If You should save us from this, we will surely be among the thankful.'" (Yunus: 22),
[Al-Alusi says]:
"This verse indicates that the polytheists, in such circumstances, do not call upon anyone other than Allah, Exalted is He. And yet, you are well aware that today, when people are faced with grave danger or a dire calamity on land or sea,
"This verse indicates that the polytheists, in such circumstances, do not call upon anyone other than Allah, Exalted is He. And yet, you are well aware that today, when people are faced with grave danger or a dire calamity on land or sea,
they call upon those who neither harm nor benefit, who neither see nor hear. Among them are those who make Du'a to al-Khidr or Ilyas, those who invoke Abu al-Khamees or al-Abbas, those who seek aid from one of the imams, and those who plead to
a sheikh from among the Shuyukh of the ummah.
You will scarcely find anyone among them who directs their supplications (Du'a) and pleas exclusively to their Lord. It rarely even crosses their minds that if they were to call upon Allah alone, they would be saved from calamities.
You will scarcely find anyone among them who directs their supplications (Du'a) and pleas exclusively to their Lord. It rarely even crosses their minds that if they were to call upon Allah alone, they would be saved from calamities.
So, by Allah, I ask you: which of these two groups is better guided in this regard? And whose supplication is more correct and sound?
To Allah alone is the complaint of a time when the winds of ignorance have blown fiercely, the waves of misguidance have crashed violently,
To Allah alone is the complaint of a time when the winds of ignorance have blown fiercely, the waves of misguidance have crashed violently,
the ship of Shari’ah has been wrecked, and seeking help from others besides Allah has become a means of salvation.
Those who truly have understanding have found it difficult to enjoin what is right, as countless forms of danger have obstructed the forbidding of what is wrong."
Those who truly have understanding have found it difficult to enjoin what is right, as countless forms of danger have obstructed the forbidding of what is wrong."
[End of quote.]
So, common Dan, answer his question! and tell him how dare you think Sufi grave worshippers of your time are worse than Pagan Arabs.
Al-Alusi even lements his time, calls it a time of ignorance, misguidance, danger against those who may want to enjoin good
So, common Dan, answer his question! and tell him how dare you think Sufi grave worshippers of your time are worse than Pagan Arabs.
Al-Alusi even lements his time, calls it a time of ignorance, misguidance, danger against those who may want to enjoin good
and forbid evil and shirk; a time where the ship of Shari’ah has been wrecked. That's all in his view was due to them asking Istighatha from other than Allah. But, Shaikh Muhammad was evil according to Dan, purposely making things up on innocent people to accuse them of Shirk.
Daniel repeatedly exposes himself not only as a heretic but also as a weak and inconsistent individual who relies on spoon-fed information that he haphazardly picks up and shares solely for the sake of arguing. This behavior stems from his belief that his audience
consists mostly of gullible individuals who would not scrutinize the glaring inconsistencies in his statements.
Now, even with the man he claims as his imam and aligns with on this specific matter, we see that he reported the condition of those at his time
Now, even with the man he claims as his imam and aligns with on this specific matter, we see that he reported the condition of those at his time
[the same people Ibn Abdelwahhab was dealing with] and explicitly stated that the polytheists of pre-Islamic Arabia were more guided than those Mushrikin; people of Istighatha and Saint worship of his era.
Al-Alusi even provided the exact example that Ibn Abdel-Wahhab; referencing the same verse.
Dan now has only a few options:
1. Admit his selective criticism of Ibn Abdel-Wahhab.
2. Admit his imam Al-Alusi, accused "apparent Muslims" of being worse than pre-Islamic polytheists.
Dan now has only a few options:
1. Admit his selective criticism of Ibn Abdel-Wahhab.
2. Admit his imam Al-Alusi, accused "apparent Muslims" of being worse than pre-Islamic polytheists.
3. Reveal his moronity by avoiding this with some meme.
If you are a danndy fan, tag him to address what he will hide his face from.
If you are a danndy fan, tag him to address what he will hide his face from.
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...