Jahmis VS Women!
It is well known that Jahmis, Ash'aris, Maturidis and their like think low of common people when it comes to understanding correct Creed, including the salaf. They also specify that women, by greater extension, are far removed from comprehending it.
1/16🧵 x.com
It is well known that Jahmis, Ash'aris, Maturidis and their like think low of common people when it comes to understanding correct Creed, including the salaf. They also specify that women, by greater extension, are far removed from comprehending it.
1/16🧵 x.com
This is why they find it nowadays convenient to restrict women on matters of Islam to issues related to how to best obey a Jahmi grave worshipper husband for exmple. This is what Islam revolves around for these heretics, and that is pretty much it,
for how could women possibly fathom correct aqeedah and Tawheed!
It is also evident in their opposition to Ahl al-Sunnah and Ahl al-Hadith when it comes to dawah directed toward women. Deep down, they know it wouldn’t work to confront these women
It is also evident in their opposition to Ahl al-Sunnah and Ahl al-Hadith when it comes to dawah directed toward women. Deep down, they know it wouldn’t work to confront these women
with the reality of their positions and what they actually believe because doing so may potentially — or most certainly — drive them away from it, either because of how abhorrent their beliefs are or because they assume women can’t understand them;
(Beliefs like: God is neither in the world nor outside, and that God could command blasphemy, rape, and anything that is prohibited! yet, it all will be reversed and deemed good). While they are right about the majority of people not understanding their positions,
this is not because of women particularly, but rather because anyone with sound intellect or clear disposition would find their views to be contradictory and insanely unacceptable.
Thus, they try to appeal to women from another perspective, telling them,
Thus, they try to appeal to women from another perspective, telling them,
“We are less strict than those Wahhabis,” implying, “We’re more in line with liberalism, so you wouldn’t have much of a problem with us like you would with a Salafi.” I don’t need to comment on how ridiculous this is. Islam has become synonymous with Wahhabism to these people,
and so, when they dislike something within Islam and want to attack it, they avoid labeling it with an Islamic term. Instead, they strawman it to make it appear as though they are attacking Wahhabism or something else.
This has always been the consistent approach of heretics throughout the history of Islam: they label Ahl al-Hadith with derogatory names or attach them to a bad reputation so they can slide in their otherwise abhorrent, unacceptable, and nonsensical views.
Since we are in the context of speaking about women, perhaps this is the reason why they can’t bring themselves to accept the report in Sahih Muslim about the Messenger of God, peace be upon him, asking the slave girl where Allah is, and her response that He is in heaven.
They always try to find ways to reinterpret this. Given what they think about women, perhaps that is an extra reason for them to think derogatorily about that sahabiyyah, accuse her sound understanding, and claim that the Prophet only accepted her response
because she couldn’t know better (See the attached page from Al-bayyadi).
But what is even more dangerous is that they are explicitly saying the Messenger of God affirmed what is false and blasphemous because, according to them, he couldn’t otherwise explain the truth to people
But what is even more dangerous is that they are explicitly saying the Messenger of God affirmed what is false and blasphemous because, according to them, he couldn’t otherwise explain the truth to people
due to the limitation of their understanding. In other words, the Messenger of God, who was sent to guide people to the truth, was, in their view, unable to guide them and, worse than that, had to approve their false beliefs.
(Of course, these beliefs are not false, but these heretics deem them false as they disagree with their heretical fundamentals.)
This accusation doesn’t stop at the Messenger of God, peace be upon him. It extends to God Himself — exalted is He — who, according to them,
This accusation doesn’t stop at the Messenger of God, peace be upon him. It extends to God Himself — exalted is He — who, according to them,
sent a revelation rampant with blasphemies. Beyond that, He is the one who created our innate disposition (fitrah) —both for men and women— which, according to them, fundamentally contradicts truth, and one must change it to understand them, as Al-razi quoted Aristotle saying it.
Therefore, what greater attack could be directed at Islam and its best generations of men and women than this?
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...