The aforementioned inscription also refers to Samantasena as the ‘Head ornament of Kshatriyas’, rendered in the term ‘क्षत्रियणं’.
The same notion has been reaffirmed in the Govindapur and Tarapanadighi copperplate inscriptions of Lakshmansena.
Furthermore, the aforementioned inscription designates Samantasena as the ‘कर्णाट क्षत्रियणं’ (lit. Head ornament of the Karnata Kshatriyas).
This designation suggests a nuanced understanding, as it would not align with the interpretation of Brahma-Kshatriya as merely a ‘Brahmin who embraced martial pursuits’.
A discourse elucidating the term Brahma-Kshatriya, frequently associated with the sovereigns of the illustrious Sena Dynasty. 👇
x.com
x.com
This unfortunate conflation led him to erroneously attribute the lineage of the Sena Dynasty to the Baidyas, thus casting a shadow of injustice upon the historical narrative.
After a meticulous dive into the treasure trove of contemporary and nearly contemporary sources regarding the Sena Dynasty, one can confidently assert that this dynasty was, without a doubt, a Chandravanshi/Somvanshi Kshatriya lineage, rather than a Brahma-Kshatriya/Baidya one.
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...