80 years, and these people are still using manipulated images and holocaust atrocity propaganda to manufacture sympathy for their genocidal terrorist regime.
Nice try. You will find no sympathy here jew.
No quarter. No mercy.
Nice try. You will find no sympathy here jew.
No quarter. No mercy.
Original photo printed in the New York Times Magazine, May 6, 1945
Original article with photo.
Deceptively edited with the addition of an emaciated man for "shock value"
However, if you take a closer look at his shoulder, you can see it is a particularly bad edit.
However, if you take a closer look at his shoulder, you can see it is a particularly bad edit.
The lighting on the faces of the prisoners does not match the lighting on the standing man.
The standing person is illuminated by another light source.
The standing person is illuminated by another light source.
To hide such an obvious falsification, the photograph was simply cropped in the exposition of the museum in Buchenwald. This image was taken on January 29, 2012.
And when Obama was shown in the photo "Elie Wiesel" - the built-in man was completely cut off.
As it turns out, the name of the standing naked man - Simon Toncman. He is NOT a Jew, but a Frenchman; he ended up in the camp as a member of the Resistance movement.
Here is the original post in all its shame. The nerve of these people blows my mind.
And what are the odds that this dude was a bunk above Ellie Wiesel?
Probably pretty good considering they are both liars and frauds.
Probably pretty good considering they are both liars and frauds.
Typical "holocaust survivor" rationale.
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...