🌗 Daśārhadyumna (दशार्हद्युम्न) 🌓
🌗 Daśārhadyumna (दशार्हद्युम्न) 🌓

@dasharhadyumna

19 تغريدة 5 قراءة Dec 10, 2023
Exactly the kind of Hindutva induced malpractices we are trying to resist in our society. Shivaji was no one in the North before 2014.
Karni Sena is an organisation of Hindutva sellouts working as a fringe group of the Sangh to infiltrate into the Kshatriya/Rajput society.
Ever since Pratap Singh Bhonsale's campaign to prove himself a descendant of the Sisodias, the Marathi lobby has been tirelessly trying to infiltrate the Rajput society to prove that they are Kshatriyas.
Remember, the movement to erase Northern Regional and Classical Languages in the name of Hindi was started by Marathi Nationalists like Tilak, while safefuarding their Marathi in Maharashtra.
They want to erase North Indian civilisation and supplant it with quasi-Marathism.
Abusing the North is a constant part of their agenda, be it Bengalis or Marathis, the centers of Colonial attack of Indian civilisation.
This civilisational usurpation they've been insidiously doing since 1870s. Your icons, language, culture thus will be replaced by theirs.
An example of civilisational usurpation is evident in the Ram Temple as well.
They did Bhumi Pooja with soil from Ambedkar's house in the location of the Janmasthan. This was a statement by Sangh to us that "our Marathi Ambedkar is equal to your Northener Ram."
Non-Rajputs anyway don't bother about Dharma or anything. They got the proverbial Magic Lamp of Alladin that they grabbed hold of in 1947.
Unfortunately the Dharmic and Patriotic nature of the Rajputs has fooled them into thinking this usurpation as an assimilation.
Unbeknownst to you, you are considered a greater enemy to the state, greater than any Terrorist or Country by the State, more than the Muslims, who are treated as a necessity - a singular cause that unites majority of Indian subjects in one direction to the designs of the state.
Muslims are not even the enemies, they are the sacrificial baits that help them catch a greater harvest. The more agitated the bait is, the more ripples it creates in the water. This is a design feature of the state, not an aberration.
The State's perceived enemies OTOH were others. We should understand that Native Kingdoms were not modern India, just like Bhutan and Nepal weren't/aren't.
They can't be considered a continuity of the original Union of India, at least before Attlee and Mountbatten came to power.
In fact Pakistan, with pre-47 Punjab, Bengal and Sind, has more in common with India than the Native States. The Native States were either Hindu or Muslim, the Indian State wasn't, in fact even Pakistan wasn't.
India was a creation of the Congress, and its Socialist principles.
But Native States weren't only of the Rajputs.
Yes, that's true.
However these non-Rajput states compared to the Rajput States were very recent, and rulers were non-Native as was in case of the Bayfandis of Hyderabad, or the Marathi Scindias and Gaikwads.
Mysore was a structurally weak state and relied on British Authority a lot - evident in the episode with Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan. The Wodeyars family had recently come to power and ruled by incorporating a mixture of various local groups to even out their influence.
The Congress' center of operation was North India, traditionally Mainland India, linguistically Hindi Inter-Legible and a potential monolith that to this day decides the direction of Indian Polity.
It was ruled by Rajputs, ruling north-India since times immemorial.
Except for Rajputs all ruling dynasties are a result of usurpations, invasions or appointments, all that happened as a function of regional turbulence.
This was partly possible also because they had a familial-clan-community base, which provided strength to their Rulers.
To the Congress this was the territory they wanted, the entire existence of Congress and as a result the Indian State is an exercise at capturing Rajput Patrimony from them using various social and political canards.
Be it Peasant Movements, or the Anti-Monarchic rhetoric.
Be it the feudal atrocity trope or the democratic-republic nonsense. Even the Constitution.
There was discussion about only one community, not the Muslims or Dravidian Separatists or anyone, but one, of not giving them Indian Citizenship after taking over their lands - Rajputs.
This is assimilation? No, this is eviction and usurpation.
And what did the Rajputs do to deserve this?
If anything they are the most loyal individuals of the state, the very state that wants them and everything related to them dead and extinct.
The very state that wants to built itself over the graveyard of Rajputs.
Ironically the Army of Peasant classes recruited by the Congress to usurp the Rajputs has each had its moment of treason against India. Kashmiris, Jats, Sikh Jatts, Dravidianists - all of them.
But the only people who threaten the legitimacy of the Deep State are Rajputs, and it's a fact.
Rajputs in 1947 were everything an usurping Deep State would feel threatened and out-legitimised by.
Call me a supremacist, or call me an anti-National, this is the provable truth.

جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...