While this was an informative thread about Bahā’ullāh, an educated reader would not buy the author's conclusion
There was a lot of stretching involved here, many texts suddenly in need of reinterpretation to fit the narrative, some outright discarded
There was a lot of stretching involved here, many texts suddenly in need of reinterpretation to fit the narrative, some outright discarded
Dajjāl having Kāfir written on his forehead is in need of reinterpretation, the Jassāsah, the fact Dajjāl is alive at this very moment and chained, disfigured eyes, etc.
None of this will fly on its own, let alone all of this revisionism in one go
None of this will fly on its own, let alone all of this revisionism in one go
An example of texts being stretched: What does the Hadīth of 2 Qiblahs have to do with the Dajjāl?
The Hadīth is a metaphor for Muslims living among the Kuffār, or the Kuffār being in the Arab peninsula
The Hadīth is a metaphor for Muslims living among the Kuffār, or the Kuffār being in the Arab peninsula
Another discrepancy: OP claimed that the Hadīth of the 30 false claimants of Prophethood couldn't apply to Bahā’ullāh because he also claimed Lordship not just Prophethood
That doesn't change anything, the narration didn't say they *won't* claim anything other than Prophethood
That doesn't change anything, the narration didn't say they *won't* claim anything other than Prophethood
There are a lot of comments to be made on many of those points but the most major objection is that this reading of Bahā’ullāh doesn't account for various narrations on the Dajjāl's doings and storyline
A couple off the top of my head:
A couple off the top of my head:
1. The great Fitnah described in narrations didn't happen
To shed some light on this: Every single Prophet in the past warned their people of the Dajjāl, yet we are to believe that he already came and died and barely anyone batted an eye?
To shed some light on this: Every single Prophet in the past warned their people of the Dajjāl, yet we are to believe that he already came and died and barely anyone batted an eye?
2. Where are all the supernatural things the Dajjāl would do to convince people that he is Allāh?
Did Bahā’ullāh kill people and then revive them? Did he revive dead people to convince the living of his truthfulness? Did he make rain come down? ...
Did Bahā’ullāh kill people and then revive them? Did he revive dead people to convince the living of his truthfulness? Did he make rain come down? ...
3. OP correctly mentioned that the Dajjāl would not be allowed into al-Madīna, but he forgot to mention that he would arrive at its gates with his army but not be allowed entry
I don't recall Bahā’ullāh doing such a thing
I don't recall Bahā’ullāh doing such a thing
4. In the authentic mass-transmitted narrations: al-Masīh ‘Isā Ibn Maryam عليه السلام descends during the Dajjāl's reign, fights, and then kills him
Unless someone wants to claim that this is referring to Ibn Chirag Bibi, this should seal the deal
Unless someone wants to claim that this is referring to Ibn Chirag Bibi, this should seal the deal
Nvm
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...