Women historically don’t go to battle front lines as they’re physically weaker right? WRONG!
They can fight if they had to.
The main reason is more primal - biology & math
Read thread for a unique perspective.
They can fight if they had to.
The main reason is more primal - biology & math
Read thread for a unique perspective.
For most of human history average life expectancy was in the 40s because of infant mortality, lack of medical treatments & a more violent lifestyle. So replacing dead soldiers was an existential issue even when humans existed only in villages & tribes
If your tribe is reduced to 10 people, & man: woman ratio is 9:1, then you can replenish 9 times faster than if it’s 1:9. It’s simple math & biology. The life of one woman is worth 9 men. They absolutely need to be conserved like your existence depends on it.
Every woman lost in warfare is also the loss of any children she might have had. An individual man can impregnate multiple women simultaneously but a woman needs a full year to produce a new human and that too only for 2-3 decades of her life.
Many of these ancient societies practiced polygyny, so a decrease in men was less lethal to the tribe as loss of women. The womb was the key to collective existence and domination
Hence historically you don’t see female frontline soldiers. They would fight as a last line of defense,
Once the battle reaches your women then you’ve already lost. This is exactly why key goal of medieval invaders was capture of women
Once the battle reaches your women then you’ve already lost. This is exactly why key goal of medieval invaders was capture of women
For example in the battle of Vosges 58 BC between Germanic tribe & Juliis Caesar of Rome the Germanic woman came at the battle site with bare breasts to remind their men what they were defending
Even in martial societies like Japanese samurais. The wife was expected to study the art of war but would not accompany him into battle, However if her home was attacked she would be expected to defend it failing which, kill the children and then herself
The jauhar of Rajputs is also the same concept. When males saw the jauhar smoke coming out of the fort it meant that battle has reached the women who are burning themselves to not become wombs for invaders. All is lost. So men would go on a suicide attack (saka) & get martyred
With this context you’ll start to understand why medieval Turrani armies first target was Hindu women. And those that consider them as heroes today indulge in love or rape jihad. It’s a direct attack on Hindu wombs & numbers.
Hindus have a total fertility rate of 1.9 who is below replacement. They sanctimonious take pride on being non proselytizing but put no cost on those that proselytize them. Women are front line soldiers & victims of love/rape jihad with little defense or support to counter it.
All this basically means existential threat and extinction in the next century or so. Unless some miraculous mass awakening occurs. What do you think will happen? Write in comments and let us know
If you find our threads informative and want to know more about the history/culture/geography of the world then do subscribe to our Twitter & YouTube. Grow your knowledge by helping us grow.
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...