Long Thread:
Saudi King Saud bin Abdul Aziz had paid a 17-day long visit to India at the invitation of Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru.
Saudi King Saud bin Abdul Aziz had paid a 17-day long visit to India at the invitation of Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru.
During the historic visit, King Saudi bin Abdul Aziz, who had brought a large delegation with him including several princes, was touring several Indian cities such as Mumbai, Hyderabad, Mysore, Shimla, Agra, Aligarh and Varanasi.
When Saudi King reached Varanasi, then Indian PM, Nehru ordered to cover all the temples and idols—which came in the way of King’s convoy—with curtains.
Until Saudi King, Saud bin Abdul Aziz stayed in Varanasi, all the government buildings in the city were flagged with the words “Kalma Tayyiba.” Puja and Aarti were stopped at temples.
India’s civilizational wounds are very deep in the form of mosques, majority of them were built after demolishing temples. Why did Nehru defend the belief of attacker and oppressor?
Why did Nehru prostrate before Saudi King by insulting the nation’s own cultural heritage? Why should India follow what Saudi King conforms to in his country?
In 1955, when Nehru requested Saudi King to say, “fate of Indian Muslim was in safe hand,” he meant to say perpetrators were in safe hand of victims.
On 25 September 1956. India’s first Prime Minister too visited Saudi Arabia to carry forward West Asia diplomacy. Did Saudi King build any temple to welcome Nehru?
Temple was unthinkable in Saudi Arabia, as it defies their religious belief. In other words, Saudi Arabia didn’t compromise with its beliefs and principles. But, Nehru was standing, having bowed down his head to please Saudi King.
So Mr. @RahulGandhi please study the history of your family before talking about Bharat.
@RahulGandhi Further read: trunicle.com
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...