Rule of law is about abstractions and extracting "rules" from particular cases. Now think about what the Indian #IOI Supreme Court has to do
To allow (Make legal): Why are all thieves Modi Modi Modi
and (Make illegal) : Why are all thieves Khan Khan Khan.
To allow (Make legal): Why are all thieves Modi Modi Modi
and (Make illegal) : Why are all thieves Khan Khan Khan.
the Supreme Court can do tricks like :
you see Modi does not refer to a group..atleast a group recognized by constitution, it is a surname.. etc etc.
and then never even ATTEMPT to derive a uniform rule. or objective test. This is a feature of Indian #IOI juris.
you see Modi does not refer to a group..atleast a group recognized by constitution, it is a surname.. etc etc.
and then never even ATTEMPT to derive a uniform rule. or objective test. This is a feature of Indian #IOI juris.
I keep saying India #IOI Jurisprudence is a danger to the western democracies as we export humans to their societies - who have never seen "uniform rule of law" principles. They expect Ad-Hoc ism. My case is special.
Key cases in India - I call them #IdeaOfIndia vs #Core have to now be settled in SCOTUS.
> poor framing
> absence of attempt to derive objective tests
> D pampering
> transformative zeal
> logical fallacies
> poor framing
> absence of attempt to derive objective tests
> D pampering
> transformative zeal
> logical fallacies
an example of the fallacious - is the supernumary quota.
> why are you crying about 27% obc quota - we added 27% new seats, hence your (open) seats are unchanged.
> however that wasnt broached during the 10% EWS - why are you crying we added , can add 10% ..
> why are you crying about 27% obc quota - we added 27% new seats, hence your (open) seats are unchanged.
> however that wasnt broached during the 10% EWS - why are you crying we added , can add 10% ..
What happens in India compared to USA
** very very few to none independent Thinkers and Public Intellectuals.
only the independently wealthy can do it. It appears. Otherwise to survive on par with 2 yr exp IT employee you gotta take out 1L/month.
** very very few to none independent Thinkers and Public Intellectuals.
only the independently wealthy can do it. It appears. Otherwise to survive on par with 2 yr exp IT employee you gotta take out 1L/month.
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...