Recently, the Secretary of the Security Council of Kyrgyzstan, Marat Imankulov has made unsubstantiated allegations regarding the significant presence of ISKP members in northern Afghanistan and the dissemination of extremist ideology originating from that region.
[Thread] ⬇️
[Thread] ⬇️
These claims, lacking empirical backing, have the potential to generate significant attention and raise concerns among the international community.
⬇️
⬇️
Since the return of the Taliban government, the Taliban has successfully targeted and eliminated several high-ranking leaders of the ISKP, effectively disrupting the group's operations.
⬇️
⬇️
Additionally, it is noteworthy that the ISKP has refrained from claiming responsibility for any attacks over the past eight weeks, indicating a significant reduction in their engagement in militant activities.
⬇️
⬇️
If there were indeed a group with 7,000 fighters in Afghanistan, it would be highly unlikely for the Taliban to maintain such robust territorial control.
⬇️
⬇️
During this highly sensitive period, nations around the world are actively seeking avenues to engage and potentially exert influence over the decision-making processes of the Taliban. This pursuit stems from the acknowledgment, as articulated by Imankulov himself,…
⬇️
⬇️
…that there is currently no viable alternative available.
Given the absence of a viable alternative, it becomes crucial to carefully analyze one's approach toward engaging with the Taliban.
⬇️
Given the absence of a viable alternative, it becomes crucial to carefully analyze one's approach toward engaging with the Taliban.
⬇️
It is essential to delve into the United States' interaction and the Doha agreement with the Taliban, in order to extract valuable lessons from it. By presenting genuine demands and adopting a realistic approach,…
⬇️
⬇️
…the US successfully obtained the Taliban's commitment to preventing the operation of Al-Qaeda within Afghanistan.
As a result of the Doha agreement, Al-Qaeda maintained a subdued presence and refrained from expanding its capabilities in Afghanistan.
⬇️
As a result of the Doha agreement, Al-Qaeda maintained a subdued presence and refrained from expanding its capabilities in Afghanistan.
⬇️
Even amidst reports of a drone strike targeting Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul, Al-Qaeda has been reluctant to confirm his demise or announce a successor. Meanwhile, the Taliban have unequivocally denied his presence in Afghanistan.
⬇️
⬇️
Taliban leaders have demonstrated a clear determination to prevent transnational groups from operating within Afghanistan. While there may still exist certain groups or individuals residing in the country, their capacity and presence have not witnessed any…
⬇️
⬇️
…significant growth since the Taliban's return to power. On the contrary, their public visibility in Afghanistan has decreased.
⬇️
⬇️
It is reasonable to assert that Afghanistan currently harbors only remnants of militant groups or individuals. It is worth noting that these groups were initially supported by the US & aligned with their cause, but later the US made the decision to confront and oppose them.
⬇️
⬇️
When comparing the current de facto Taliban government's 20-month rule in Afghanistan with their previous reign in the 1990s, there is a noticeable improvement, generating a sense of positivity and encouragement.
⬇️
⬇️
The Taliban's unwavering stance on prohibiting the use of Afghanistan's territory for aggression against other nations demonstrates their dogmatism. However, it is important to acknowledge the ideological constraints they face when addressing this matter,…
⬇️
⬇️
… as it may influence the extent to which they can effectively enforce their policy.
⬇️
⬇️
In addition to the abundance of unverifiable statements and reports, it is noteworthy that in today's era of widespread internet access, there is a notable absence of videos depicting militant training centers or credible threats originating from Afghanistan.
⬇️
⬇️
Due to the historical perception and treatment of the Taliban as an adversary, a substantial trust deficit exists not only within the international community but also within the ranks of the Taliban.
⬇️
⬇️
Unsubstantiated allegations have the potential to exacerbate skepticism and foster additional suspicions, further widening the trust gap between the parties involved.
⬇️
⬇️
To foster constructive engagement with the de facto authorities in Afghanistan, countries need to reassess their approach. Resorting to public mudslinging has proven ineffective in dealing with the Taliban.
⬇️
⬇️
It is important to refrain from publicly shaming and blaming, as this approach could potentially lead the Taliban into denial. Instead, it is crucial to strive for a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and constraints encountered by the Taliban.
⬇️
⬇️
By doing so, we can effectively engage with the de facto government and find more productive avenues for dialogue and progress.
[END]
[END]
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...