رتبها

Exposing the 2022 FIFA World Cup and how it was rigged for Argentina to win.
[Thread]

This thread will be split into 3 major components:
A. Quotes from important figures
B. Refereeing errors (alongside extra quotes from players, pundits, and former referees)
C. Unnoticed 'Home' field advantage for Argentina

Length of each segment:
A. Shortest part of the thread
B. About half the thread
C. About half the thread

Part A - Quotes

“Seeing Messi lift the trophy in what could be his last World Cup would be something really special for us organisers."
- Hasan Al Thawadi (Chairman of the 2022 FIFA World Cup LLC)

"It would be an injustice if Messi retired without winning the World Cup."
- Gianni Infantino (President of FIFA)

Part B - Major Refereeing Errors
Watch full clips, I showed multiple replays and even emphasized where the foul is. I made it perfectly clear.

1. Argentina vs Saudi Arabia (Group)

Penalty for Argentina.
Parades PULLS the Saudi player towards him and falls down to make it look like a penalty.
Its a normal collision that happens many times per game, and it didn't affect the play.

2. Argentina vs Poland (Group)

Penalty for Argentina
Messi already headed the ball and it went out for a goal kick. Szczęsny barely touched Messi's face AFTER he headed the ball.
Not a foul, and didn't affect the play at all.

3. Argentina vs Netherlands (Quarter Final)

Penalty for Argentina
There was contact indeed, but Acuna's momentum was the main reason he fell. This kind of contact does not bring someone down otherwise. VERY SOFT penalty.

NO penalty for The Netherlands
There were no replays shown, making it more suspicious. You can still see there is clear contact though.

No second yellow for Parades
Reckless foul AND smashed the ball at the Dutch bench.

No yellow card for Messi's blatant handball
He got another yellow later, could've been red carded overall.

"Messi takes the ball with his hand and the referee just lets it go. He was really scandalous."
- Frenkie de Jong

4. Argentina vs Croatia (Semi Final)

Penalty for Argentina
The GK comes out but stands still at the last second, both feet planted.

"I can't believe that penalty was awarded. It's clear that it changed the whole game."
- Luka Modric

"There's no way that's a penalty."
- Gary Neville
"They didn't even check the VAR. I've no idea why. It's not a penalty."
-Ian Wright
"I agree with the lads, that's not a penalty for me."
- Roy Keane

"The goalkeeper's feet are always on the floor, he never tripped him. The contact is inevitable. Not a penalty."
- Felipe Ramos Rizo (former FIFA referee)
"Totally Agree with Felipe."
- Iker Casillas

5. Argentina vs France

Penalty for Argentina
Di Maria kicks himself down. Watch full clip.

Now, moving on to disprove claims "if it was rigged for Argentina, why did France get 2 penalties?"
The 2 penalties France got were 100% clear cut. The referee could NOT have ignored them.

Penalty 1 for France
Contact: Knee to the hamstring

Penalty 2 for France
Clear handball.

"But that 2nd penalty for France should have been a free kick to Argentina, because the French player handballed it before Mbappe got the ball!"
WRONG. He headed it backwards to Mbappe. No handball.

Messi's 2nd goal (3-2) should have been disallowed because Argentinian subs entered the field before he scored.

Obviously it would've been harsh to rule out the goal as the subs had no impact, but it would've been consistent with the bullshit calls they gave Argentina the entire tournament.

For example the penalty vs Poland; Messi already headed the ball out of play, so the keeper touching his face had no impact on anything, the same way these subs had no impact as well. Where is the consistency?

Now that we have clearly shown Argentina were favored in every game they played (bar the Saudi game because they conceded an offside goal, so it was 50/50), lets move on to the DISGRACEFUL unnoticed 'home' field advantage they had for the majority of the tournament.

Part C - 'Home' advantage for Argentina
Argentina were given the luxury to play in Lusail Stadium in 5 out of their 7 matches. Why did no other team recieve such treatment? Why only them?

Its very simple, they wanted the Argentine players to be as comfortable as possible. It adds up with why they got so many refereeing errors their way.

Argentina vs Saudi Arabia (Group)
- Lusail Stadium
Argentina vs Mexico (Group)
- Lusail Stadium
Argentina vs Poland (Group)
- Stadium 974
Argentina vs Australia (Round of 16)
- Ahmed bin Ali Stadium

Argentina vs Netherlands (Quarter Final)
- Lusail Stadium
Argentina vs Croatia (Semi Final)
- Lusail Stadium
Argentina vs France (Final)
- Lusail Stadium

The only 2 games where Argentina did not play in their 'home' stadium, Lusail Stadium, were the ones against Poland and Australia. But does that mean Argentina didn't truly have a 'home' field advantage against them?

No, they absolutely did, but in another form. They had 90% Argentina fans in both of those games. NINTY-PERCENT. Proof 👇

Have a close look at the fans in the images below. I tried to capture images of the fans from BOTH goal ends and also one from somewhere in between, so people don't think I'm being selective to fit an 'agenda'.
Also feel free to rewatch the match (or highlights) to confirm.

First, Argentina vs Poland: all you're going to see is blue/white vertical stripes, or neutral clothing. No Polish shirts in sights. None.
I'm being nice by saying only 90% are Argentina fans, it might be 99%.

All Argentina fans (make sure to zoom in)

The little bit of red you can see is just Argentine fans holding red objects. There are no red jerseys, no red/white jerseys. Nothing.

Now Argentina vs Australia:
The yellow shirt fans (representing Australia) are ONLY seen in this section. The rest of the stadium is ALL Argentina fans.

The little bit of yellow on the right is the same from the above picture, just another angle.

All Argentina fans at the other goal end 👇

All Argentina fans - middle of the stadium

This is unbelievevable. They either played in their 'home' stadium, or played in a neutral ground with 90% of the fans on their side. I'll explain how all of this happened shortly.

First I need to point out that this had a MASSIVE impact on Messi's performances. If you've been watching Messi for more than a decade like I have, you'd know that he plays much better at home than away (or neutral ground).

This is obviously true for most footballers in general, but I would like to focus on Messi since some idiots genuinely think he was the best player in the world cup.

I don't have time to go too deep into this but here's some proof:

Messi - Club Home Record
🏟 409 games
⚽️ 406 goals
🎯 145 assists
0.99 G/G
1.35 GA/G
Messi - Club Away Record
🏟 396 games
⚽️ 270 goals
🎯 142 assists
0.68 G/G (significant drop)
1.04 GA/G
He scores FAR more at home with the assists being the same, at club level.

Messi - International Home Record
🏟 42 games
⚽️ 27 goals
🎯 15 assists
0.64 G/G
1.0 GA/G
Messi - International Away Record
🏟 55 games
⚽️ 22 goals
🎯 9 assists
0.4 G/G (somewhat of a significant drop)
0.56 GA/G (significant drop)
He scores and assists a lot less away, int.

Back to the main point. For context, no other team had this kind of 'home' field advantage at a World Cup before ('home' stadium in 5/7 games and 90% fans in the other 2 games) except for the infamous South Korea in 2002, when they robbed Italy and Spain.

South Korea had ~ 80% Korean fans in their matches vs Italy and Spain. Funny how this only happens when there are robberies going on. Still think its a coincidence?

Now, I'm sure some of you think you've outsmarted me and are ready to counter this point with "Argentina has a much bigger population than Poland and Australia so they're obviously gonna have more fans". Unfortunately for you, I'm always a step ahead.

Population:
Argentina ~ 45 million
Poland ~ 38 million
Australia ~ 26 million
Poland's population is 85% of Argentina's, while Australia's is 60% of Argentina's.

Right off the bat we can somewhat understand Australia's lack of supporters, HOWEVER this doesn't explain why there are only a few hundred of them. There should be enough of them to cover around 1/3rd of the stadium.

As for the other game, there should be a bit more Argentine than Polish fans, so instead of a 9-1 ratio like we have seen in the above pictures, it should be something like 9-7.

Its absurd how there were no Polish fans in sight. And it gets even more absurd once you consider the factors below...

This World Cup held in Qatar was by far the most expensive one to attend. Both the hotels and ticket prices were extremely expensive.

Once you consider the fact that almost HALF the Argentine citizens are living below the national poverty line, the number of Argentine fans should have been even LESS than what we estimated above. It should quiet literally be at least 50/50, or more Polish fans.

Poverty stats:
1% of Polish citizens live under $5 a day
20% of Argentine citizens live under $5 a day
No information on Australia
And it gets worse...

The % of population living below National Poverty Line (according to the World Bank as of 2020)
Argentina - 42%
Poland - 15%
Australia - no information

Ok, so its quiet clear that Argentine fans should NOT make up anywhere near 90% of the stadium's capacity. There is a lack of information for Australia so we'll ignore it for now, although I suspect Australia's poverty rate is no where near as bad as Argentina's.

On a side note, I do hope things get better in Argentina. Its sad seeing them in this state.

SUMMARY: Argentina vs Poland
Population
- Argentina ~ 45 million
- Poland ~ 38 million (84% of ARG's)
% of population living below National Poverty Line
- Argentina ~ 42%
- Poland ~ 15%

What excuse is there now to defend the fact that 90% of the stadium's capacity was filled with Argentina fans?
Now time for the explanation of how that happened.

So where did all those extra Argentine fans come from? Simple. The first factor obviously being that FIFA sold the majority of seats to Argentina fans.

The second factor is that Qatar bought many fans from eastern countries to the World Cup and gave them fake jerseys to wear and to pretend to be real fans.

They obviously didn't do this for every single team. I assume Poland was one of the teams that were left out because I never saw evidence of Indian fans supporting Poland. I did see Indian fans supporting Argentina, Brazil, England and some other countries though.

You can't tell me Indian fans genuinely support England, thats the proof that all these fans were fake. It would be a massive REACH to assume the Argentina and Brazil fans were real while the England fans were fake ...

... because they all look the same, all act the same, all are wearing the same fake jerseys with the same dodgy printing on the back.

Its CRYSTAL CLEAR that all these fans belong to the same group of people that Qatar brought in and paid to attend the World Cup.

Qatar literally controlled how many fans they wanted from each nation, so that they have even more influence on the outcomes of the games. This has NEVER happened before.

Anyway, here are the Argentina fans they bought 👇
look how forced their reactions are 🤣

These are the fans that filled up the stadium during Poland vs Argentina.
Now that we're done with the 'home' field advantage for Argentina, I want to show you France's stadiums for a bit of constrast.

France vs Australia (Group)
- Al Janoub Stadium
France vs Denmark (Group)
- Stadium 974
France vs Tunisia (Group)
- Education City Stadium
France vs Poland (Round of 16)
- Al Thumama Stadium

France vs England (Quarter Final)
- Al Bayt Stadium
France vs Morocco (Semi Final)
- Al Bayt Stadium
France vs Argentina (Final)
- Lusail Stadium

Every single game was played at a different stadium, bar the QF and SF. So 2/7 for France, 5/7 for Argentina. Big difference. The French team only felt at 'home' in the SF.
Argentina go into the final having played 4 times already in the Lusail Stadium while France not even once

All facts aside, now my theory on this:
FIFA and Qatar tried to set up an Argentina-France Final to please all parties invovled and also to make Messi win the World Cup so that it'll be remembered as the "best World Cup ever".

That's because most football fans love Messi, thanks to his 'humble' personality and the way the media has always portrayed him as a 'good boy' while portraying Ronaldo as the villain of football. Ofcourse, he plays beautiful football too, no doubt. A joy to watch.

Ronaldo being made the villain was very important to make Messi look good. Rivalries between 2 entities has always excited people since the beginning of time. Its gets lots of attention and people get really invested.

They tried to get as many people as possible on this rivalry by trying to show that one side is 'good' and the other is 'evil'. This makes it way more exciting. Messi the 'hero', Ronaldo the 'villain'. Messi winning in the end is the equivalent of 'good' 'beating' 'evil'.

So here are the reasons for wanting an Argentina-France final. (So far I only explained why they wanted Argentina to win).

They wanted Argentina in the final (and to win it) because Messi is a PSG player (PSG is owned by the state of Qatar) and they wanted him to extend with PSG (which he just did).
Its also better for their brand, and for the brand of Ligue 1 as a whole, so France wins too.

They wanted France in the final because PSG is literally in Paris, France. They wanted to keep their relationship with the French government strong.

I assume another potential reason would be because of the crazy sequence of political events that was occuring inside of PSG last season after getting knocked out by Real Madrid in the UCL R16. But not too sure on that. Could be irrelevant.
Moving on.

Here's FIFA dropping a hint on October 14:
After reading this thread so far you still think this is a coincidence? 🤣
Argentina and France flags are the biggest 🤔

I think FIFA knew France would make it out of their group and easily beat Poland in the Round of 16, which is why they didn't feel the need to help them through 'home' advantage.

However, once they got into the Semi Final, they allowed them to play in the same stadium as they did in the Quarter Final, a way to raise their chances of reaching the final

Also, note that the virus started spreading among the French players before their Semi Final with Morocco. So that was another reason to 'help' them out. But of course in the final they played in Argentina's 'home' stadium (with the virus) to ensure they lose.

Very detailed plan. They wanted France to make the final but they didn't want them to actually win it.

Oh, and if you're wondering what virus I'm talking about, here's a whole thread I made covering the similarities between the 1998 and 2022 WC, how they were both rigged in a similar way, which includes talk of the virus.

In summary, they wanted to weaken the French Squad because they were much stronger than Argentina. Proof is all in that thread.

Disgraceful World Cup victory for Argentina.
[END OF THREAD]

1. Influencing the public then deleting to remove the evidence.
2. Disrespecting who is objectively one of the greatest players in the history of the game.

Not related to FIFA but at least these f*ckers are open about this now.

We have referees lying now...
That picture he used is when Martinez made the last second save, NOT when Mbappe scored his penalty.

Just in: Referee of World Cup final admits to making a crucial mistake.
“Of course, there were mistakes in this final. I interrupted the French counter-attack after a bad tackle by Marcos Acuna."

"I was afraid that the fouled player wanted to unwind, and I read it wrong because nothing happened, and you could give an advantage and then come back with a card."
“It’s hard. In a game like this, I take such a mistake in the dark."

Penalty not given to France...

التصنيفات

المزيد من هذا الكاتب

مواضيع ذات صلة

الأكثر اعجابا

التصنيفات

المزيد من هذا الكاتب

مواضيع ذات صلة

الأكثر اعجابا

فك الثريد