Commonly, narrators are beings that have intimate knowledge of the plot, but don't exert any influence on it. In other words, they don't have a stake in it. You could even say that they are *above* the plot.
Askin's mentality and mannerisms reflect this idea.
Askin's mentality and mannerisms reflect this idea.
As if to signify he's above the plot itself.
Through subtle details like this, as well as design choices, it's conveyed that Askin is different from his comrades.
Then again, there are a lot more things that convey the fact that Askin is different than just his dressing sense.
Through subtle details like this, as well as design choices, it's conveyed that Askin is different from his comrades.
Then again, there are a lot more things that convey the fact that Askin is different than just his dressing sense.
The breakdown of the construction of Askin I've done so far has been fairly basic. However, when we look deep enough, the contradictions start to show themselves.
First of all, the most obvious contradiction is in his mannerisms itself.
First of all, the most obvious contradiction is in his mannerisms itself.
Agency. A central pillar of Bleach.
Askin has a fairly complex relationship with agency. At first glance, it seems like everything he does is by his own design, including the enforcement of the differences between his comrades and himself in a stylistic sense and otherwise.
Askin has a fairly complex relationship with agency. At first glance, it seems like everything he does is by his own design, including the enforcement of the differences between his comrades and himself in a stylistic sense and otherwise.
The key to understanding why he does so ties into the contradiction in his characterization that runs the deepest: the subversion of his role as the narrator.
In fact, the breakdown of Askin's construction I've given shows 2 important instances where this function is undermined.
In fact, the breakdown of Askin's construction I've given shows 2 important instances where this function is undermined.
I say that's an intentional design. For one, attributing to a character a role as important as the narrator's, stressing on the implications of the same, just for it to lead nowhere is not an oversight Kubo would make.
Moreover, Askin not being a complete narrator -
Moreover, Askin not being a complete narrator -
Since this comes from Kubo's mouth directly, it takes precedence over what we can infer from Askin's mannerisms.
What these points of subversion tell us of is the falsity of Askin's agency in a sense.
And what we can conclude from this leads us to the crux of his character.
What these points of subversion tell us of is the falsity of Askin's agency in a sense.
And what we can conclude from this leads us to the crux of his character.
- his strength which is a product of Yhwach's Auswahlen and not him, all these are things Askin had no say in.
Whether his interests align with the decisions made for him is of no consequence. The important thing here is that HE didn't choose any of this.
Whether his interests align with the decisions made for him is of no consequence. The important thing here is that HE didn't choose any of this.
One thing to note before moving forward is that I'll no longer make distinctions between characteristics assigned to Askin vs those he enforces of his own volition, unless the distinction is relevant to the point I'm making.
This is because, despite his disdain of having those characteristics assigned to him without his say in it, they are still his. This actually has tremendous significance for him too, as we'll soon see, which is all the more reason to conflate the two types of characteristics.
Everything they do, everything they are, it all ties back to him. Such is their dynamic with Yhwach. This applies to Askin as well.
Yhwach is a walking contradiction, and the Schutzstaffel all parallel him in that regard. But there is something that distinguishes Askin.
Yhwach is a walking contradiction, and the Schutzstaffel all parallel him in that regard. But there is something that distinguishes Askin.
Hence my statement that Askin represents Yhwach's humanity.
Now, apart from this, there is obviously the general idea of the Schutzstaffel being walking contradictions that Askin is also part of.
The agency section of the thread seems to explain away the contradictions, -
Now, apart from this, there is obviously the general idea of the Schutzstaffel being walking contradictions that Askin is also part of.
The agency section of the thread seems to explain away the contradictions, -
Sure, the contradictions in their character serve a purpose for the thematic framework, but Askin's contradictory writing is much more personally impactful. It goes a long way in humanizing the antagonist force. Striving to find worth in oneself is very human, after all.
Yhwach, Pernida, Mayuri, Kisuke, As Nodt, Gremmy, Giselle, Aizen, etc. You could swing around a dead rat in Bleach and hit 21 people whose ability affects your bodily agency. Askin isn't special in that regard as well.
It's pretty evident how much pains Kubo took to constantly show how contradictory Askin's portrayal of "speciality" is. This, in fact, is the root of Askin pursuing self-affirmation. And, obviously, this inherent contradiction bleeds back to Yhwach.
More importantly, since Ichigo has the function of altering the fate of the people he battles, it's been theorized that his Quincy ability is a passive form of the Almighty.
If you made it all the way here, you're actually genuinely a GOAT. This could NOT have been easy. Thank you for reading.
Thanks to @ReioRemms and @zerocolors10 for their help with this thread.
@Moslley @VsFeral gas this, my parents
Thanks to @ReioRemms and @zerocolors10 for their help with this thread.
@Moslley @VsFeral gas this, my parents
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...