No matter how much you guys want to defame Akbar or anyone else for that matter, just don't victimize rajputs in your narratives to achieve that. All these stories is not in anyway corroborated by Akbar's historians like Abul Fazl or even Akbar's critic Badayuni
Yet you included them in your sources list. Tod wrote in 19th century, centuries after Akbar and without any evidences whatsoever he wrote these stories. Prithviraj's name he takes to make this story, didnt write anything of this sort, same Tod includes another story
of Pratap's life that too, we come to know in the name of Prithviraj, which is also completely false and Prithviraj didnt write that. The story of Maharana Pratap eating "Hare Ghaas ki Roti", and after seeing his family suffer, "He writes to Akbar a letter"
after which Prithviraj writes a letter to Rana encouraging him to not do so. And Pratap's fire is rekindled and he leave that idea. Such kind of stories are of no historical value whatsover and "opium eater's tales" which Tod included in his narrative.
William Crooke who edited Tod's book also says that no muslim historians mention such story. And abt story of Rana sending letter to akbar, wouldnt any muslim historian would mention that given such an achievement that Pratap himself wanted to surrender.
No contemporary historians or any contemporary European traveller write any such non-sense abt rajputs. The sources you mentioned, like Ain i Akbari, Badayuni, AL Shrivastava, VA Smith etc no one says anything abt rajputs and most doesnt say anything abt such
nauroj (navroj) incidents. While you mentioned these fake sources, your real source is P.N. Oak as pointed by @yashasvipratap , PN Oak, really, need I say more. The travellers you mentioned, Manucci, came during Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb's rule not Akbar's as you mentioned, later
corrected of course but didnt mention that Manucci was not talking abt Akbar but his contemporary mughal emperors, so its a false source. And even he does not mention anything abt rajputs. No one of your Travellers is contemporary not Manucci not Coryat.
These travellers wrote many such stories like Coryat wrote that Akbar once cut the head off of one of his wives and then with Tantra vidhya re-attached it without any sign of sword wound as if nothing happened.
So my advice is leave P.N. Oak on side and do whatever you want to do, abuse Akbar as much as you want but don't include rajputs in your fake narratives.
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...