When Mathura and Vrindavan was sacked it was in Jat territory and although Rajputs were not there, Marathas were there and not a single Maratha fought to save these holy lands, all fled. In the language of Jadunath Sarkar, Marathas took chauth from Jats but Chauth money
was not for protection from invaders as it turned out but it was only for protection from Marathas themselves. Hence even in the face of invasion from Abdali they didn't fight for Mathura or Vrindavan, some Naga Sadhus saved Vrindavan from Abdali's soldiers. And Jats
fought for Mathura. And Later the fight with Abdali at Panipat was not for saving india for invader but a fight to save mughal throne from abdali as said by their commander Sadashivrao. And even at that they did poor job. Jats didn't fight at Panipat despite their quarrel
Thousands of Naga Sadhus fought from the side of Abdali to defeat Marathas. These warrior saints of hinduism fought against Marathas at Panipat is not told by your average historians because that will make their history of hindu vs muslim at panipat less credible.
It was mughals vs abdali and Mughals were helped by Marathas. And about fighting, if Sadashivrao was only fighting for hinduism then he wouldn't write Mafinama to Abdali where he gave blank cheque in the form of a blan letter with his palm's impression made by saffron
and told Abdali that whatever he wants he can have but let's not fight with us. So much for marathas saving hindus. Malhar rao holkar the real traitor of the battle will never be called by these narrative historians, and will blame on rajputs, Jats, Sikhs. Sikh had their problem
with Abdali and even they didn't support Marathas. Something must have been wrong with marathas when every enemy of Abdali didn't help Marathas or even helped Abdali like Naga Sadhus fighting under Shuja ud Daula from the side of Abdali. And Malhar Rao Holkar,
fled from battle with his whole army at the heat of the battle without lifting his sword even once. No Holkar army even moved in the battle let alone fighting except when they decided to flee. Even Sindhia's most army fled leaving their clan head Jankoji a young boy
in the Panipat. Jankoji Sindhia who was a boy of 13-14 years was head of Sindhia clan and never left Malhar rao Holkar alone and stuck with like a boy clung to his mother. But traitor sindhia in his flight left that boy and head of sindhias clan alone in the battle
whose responsibility was all his. Later the Same Malhar rao Holkar became close friends with Rohilla sardar Najib khan who was responsible for Maratha debacle at Panipat. Here is your traitor but these marathi chauvinist and historians will find traitor outside of maratha
castes, some in rajputs, some in jats, some in sikhs and some in Naga Sadhus when there were none. And funny thing is the movie Panipat in search of a traitor made a fictional character Arajak Singh with of course Rajput name and dress and made him a traitor.
Forget about this marathi narrative truth is Panipat was not Hindu muslim war but Mughal Afghan war where Marathas as nominal vassals of Mughals for search of more money fought and lost due to their own incompetence and treachery of their own kind nothing more.
Addendum: Jankoji Sindhia, the boy, I didn't tell was butchered in Panipat after he was left in lurch by Holkar.
Errata: In the 9th tweet, it is traitor Holkar not traitor Sindhia, Jankoji always clung with Holkar as he was a young boy and Holkar left this boy alone in the Panipat to die and saved himself by fleeing.
جاري تحميل الاقتراحات...